Are Our Gifts Too Big for Our Field of Labor?
I've just begun reading the Letters of Samuel Rutherford. I've heard or read a number of pastors commending these letters, so I thought I'd add it to my devotional reading. I've not actually reached the letters yet. I've been slowly reading through the biographical sketch of Rutherford written by Andrew Bonar.
At one point, Bonar describes Rutherford's call to a small country parish called Anwoth.
The parish of Anwoth had no large village near the church. The people were scattered over a hilly district, and were quite a rural flock. But their shepherd knew that the Chief Shepherd counted them worth caring for; he was not one who thought that his learning and talents would be ill spent if laid out in seeking to save souls, obscure and unknown. See him setting out to visit! He has just laid aside one of his learned folios, to go forth among his flock. See him passing along yonder field, and climbing that hill on his way to some cottage, his "quick eyes" occasionally glancing on the objects around, but his "face upward" for the most part, as if he were gazing into heaven. He has time to visit, for he rises at three in the morning, and at that early hour meets his God in prayer and meditation, and has space for study besides. He takes occasional days for catechising. He never fails to be found at the sick-beds of his people. Men said of him, "He is always praying, always preaching, always visiting the sick, always catechising, always writing and studying." He was known to fall asleep at night talking of Christ, and even to speak of Him during his sleep.
Several things struck me. Obviously Rutherford's faithfulness was striking, even if the repetition of "always" this or "always" that was a bit daunting and depressing. I was also reminded of how many technological advantages in pastoral ministry we have compared to Rutherford's day.
But what I most appreciated was this line: "But their shepherd knew that the Chief Shepherd counted them worth caring for; he was not one who thought that his learning and talents would be ill spent if laid out in seeking to save souls, obscure and unknown."
I wonder if one of the main challenges facing churches might not be that too many potential shepherds think their education, gifts, and abilities would be wasted in humble, anonymous service? If there are not too many of us who remember too infrequently that the Chief Shepherd knows His blood-bought sheep in country villages are worth caring for? I wonder how many men "settle" for this or that little congregation as a "stepping stone" to a bigger, "better" ministry? How many fear that anonymity is synonymous with unfruitfulness and a certain kind of death?
And, yet, Rutherford speaks to us hundreds of years later and his faithfulness shames the most gifted and talented among us (well, let me not project onto others; it certainly shames me). Bonar adds this line a couple paragraphs later:
Anwoth was dear to him rather as the sphere appointed him by his Master, than because of the fruit he saw of his labours.
Because Christ place him there--not because he saw "great fruit"--Rutherford rooted his heart in that place and that people. May we all be satisfied to serve, and find satisfaction in serving, wherever the Master places us. And may we never regard our congregations--however small--as unworthy of our gifts or our care.



Thanks Thabiti for this much needed post.
Posted by: TW | Feb 20, 2008 11:49:43 AM
Great post. Thanks!
Interesting historical note:
It was on this day (Feb. 20) in 1636 that S.Rutherford was banished from his pulpit for a year and a half for having the gall to suggest that salvation is not by works (in his book Apology of Divine Grace). It was while he was on this forced sabbatical that he gave himself to letter writing. May every king who attempts to silence the doctrines of grace find their plans so baffled by God's providence.
Posted by: Jared | Feb 20, 2008 12:16:12 PM
Rutherford's Letters had such a profound impact on my life that my blog is dedicated to his memory. I even call it "Anwoth."
You will find Rutherford's Letters filled with Christ! The way he speaks of Christ in terms of the most intimate lover is thrilling. He is a pastor who loves his people deeply, is engaged with his culture significantly and has left a legacy in his correspondence that is, in my estimation, unmatched.
Posted by: Will | Feb 20, 2008 2:03:01 PM
Don't take this as too strong…
I am always amazed at guys who will take a position on a church staff of 15-20 pastors and hold some 9-5 paper pushing job rather than get out and pastor some small congregation of 100-200 people. I have nothing (per se) against big churches but a lot of big churches could hire an administrator with a good business background rather than a Pastor of Administration who has a seminary degree.
There are flocks wandering in need of shepherds and some places there are a bunch of shepherds sitting around a conference table drinking coffee and enjoying their comfy schedules instead of getting out like Rutherford.
Thanks for the thoughts Pastor Anyabwile and God bless you as you continue to read of this great saint and pastor!
Posted by: Jon | Feb 21, 2008 11:08:54 AM
Awesome truths said by Pastor Rutherford.
Thanks for sharing, and I look forward to reading some more on him in the future.
Posted by: Jordan Reed | Feb 21, 2008 11:42:13 PM
Thanks Thabiti. This is very encouraging. I am reminded of the following words written by an obscure and unknown Pastor I know:
"Resolved by God’s grace and not against His clear leading: I am unwilling to subject the precious sheep under my charge to the indignity and pain of saying to them that a different flock-with which I am not intimate-is more worthy of my efforts and merits the uprooting of all my perseverant labors with my flock merely because the new flock is larger (or smaller) or grazes in a more verdant, visible field. My present charge may, in some ways, take me for granted. And by jumping ship I might initially be greeted with a fresh shower of enthusiasm which would wind my efforts forward with a burst of noteworthy success. But at the end of the day, would I not stand guilty of sacrificing a content and vulnerable flock for the advancement of self as a shepherd? What do shepherds know of self advancement? And in the end, is it not the Chief Shepherd whose commendation matters? And will he not commend faithful, life-long fidelity to a flock that is ever confident in the persevering, selfless love of its loyal under-shepherd?”
Posted by: Paul | Feb 26, 2008 11:31:44 PM